О проблеме коррекции деформаций грудной клетки на 23-м конгрессе Европейской Ассоциации Кардио-Торакальных Хирургов
О проблеме коррекции деформаций грудной клетки на 23-м конгрессе Европейской Ассоциации Кардио-Торакальных Хирургов
С 17 по 21 октября в Вене проходил 23 конгресс Европейской Ассоциации Кардио-Торакальных Хирургов. Большое внимание было уделено хирургии грудной стенки и коррекциям врожденных деформаций грудной клетки.
17 октября целых день проходил Техно-Колледж, подготовленный профессором Вильм из Страссбурга. А 19 октября одна из сессий конгресса была полностью посвящена проблеме грудной клетки и деформациям.
Приводим программу и сообщения по программе без перевода.
Advances in Chest Wall Surgery and Osteosynthesis
Organisers J.M. Wihlm, Strasbourg, and Domain of Thoracic Disease
Session 1 Anterior Chest Wall Deformities
Moderators J. Ribas de Campos, São Paulo; T. Treasure, London
09:00 Opening remarks/History of techniques and osteosynthesis J.M. Wihlm, Strasbourg
Pectus Excavatum
09:20 Ravitch classical procedure M. Coelho, Curitiba
09:40 Modified Ravitch techniques S. Elia, Rome
10:00 Nuss minimally invasive repair J. Ribas de Campos, São Paulo
Nuss minimally invasive repair J. Ribas de Campos, São Paulo |
Plates and screws A. Coonar, Cambridge |
![]() | ![]() |
10:20 Indications: pro and cons M. Coelho, Curitiba
10:40 Special cases: mammary hypoplasia, failures, Nuss-Ravitch conversions J.M. Wihlm, Strasbourg
11:00 Coffee
11:30 Pectus carinatum and arcuatum P.Y. Brichon, Grenoble
11:50 Pectus and Marfan syndrome: cardiothoracic strategy J.P. Verhoye, Rennes
12:10 Panel discussion/conclusions
12:30 Lunch
Session 2 Chest Wall Tumours and Reconstruction
Moderators A. Chapelier, Paris; D. Miller, Atlanta
13:30 History and principles: the Emory Clinic experience D. Miller, Atlanta
Techniques for Reconstruction
14:00 Soft substitutes: Marlex, Gore-tex, meshes P. Rajesh, Birmingham
14:20 Stabilisation: methyl-methacrylate C. Spector, Buenos Aires
14:40 Stabilisation: metallic implants J.M. Wihlm, Strasbourg
15:00 Myoplasties, omentum, skin flaps C. Spector, Buenos Aires
Topographic Indications
15:20 Sternal and anterior tumours A. Chapelier, Paris
15:40 Lateral chest wall J. Ribas de Campos, São Paulo
15:55 Superior and posterior tumours/vascular involvement J.P. Berthet, Montpellier
16:15 Complex reconstruction cases W. Klepetko, Vienna
16:30 Coffee
Session 3 Traumas: Flail Chest
Moderators D. Lardinois, Basel; J.M. Wihlm, Strasbourg
17:00 Overview of classical techniques for costal osteosynthesis P.Y. Brichon, Grenoble
Renewal of Osteosynthesis
17:15 Plates and screws A. Coonar, Cambridge
17:25 Titanium crimped implants D. Lardinois, Basel
17:35 Rib clips and staples J.M. Wihlm, Strasbourg
17:45 Presentation of cases/panel discussion P. Moreno, Vigo
18.00 Adjourn
А 19 октября одна из сессий конгресса была полностью посвящена проблеме грудной клетки и деформациям.
![]() |
040 BAR SHAPING METHOD FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE PECTUS EXCAVATUM REPAIR: EXPANDING ITS ROLE TO ASYMMETRIES AND TO ADULTS H.J. Park1, J.Y. Jeong1, W.M. Jo1, J.S. Shin1, I.S. Lee1, K.T. Kim2, Y.H. Choi3
|
![]() |
Objectives: Asymmetric pectus excavatum (PE) has not been effectively corrected with the original Nuss technique which used only symmetric bars for all types, without consideration of asymmetry. To cover a wide variety of dysmorphology, we have been shaping the bar in different designs following our novel principle, the "Terrain Contour Matching (TERCOM), a morphology-tailored approach." We propose this bar shaping method for quality repair of asymmetric and adult PE.
Methods: A single surgeon s (HJP) experience with 1250 consecutive PE repairs between August 1999 and March 2009 was analysed. The bar shaping strictly followed the TERCOM principle; chest wall depression matches the convexity of the bar, and the protrusion matches the concavity – a notch in the bar. To appraise this approach, the Asymmetry Index for post-repair symmetry and Satisfaction Score (1–4, excellent to poor) were assessed. Results: The mean age of patients was 10.4 years (16 months–51 years). In repair of 506 (40.5%) asymmetric patients, the asymmetric bar (n=491, 97.0%) for the eccentric type, and the seagull bar (n=238, 47.0%) for the unbalanced type were employed. Bar shaping for adults (age 16 years, n=284, 22.7%) and teenagers was the compound bar (n=276, 22.1%). The Asymmetry Index changed from 1.10 to 1.02 (P<0.001). Satisfaction Score of the eccentric asymmetry was equal to symmetric type (1.08 vs. 1.07, P=0.920) but the unbalanced asymmetry showed a higher score (1.18 vs. 1.07, P=0.005). Conclusions: Most of the asymmetric PE could be "quality-repaired" with the morphology-tailored bar shaping (TERCOM) approach, except some misshapen unbalanced asymmetry, which may need a further measure. |
041 VATS NUSS VERSUS RAVITCH CORRECTION OF PECTUS EXCAVATUM: AN EIGHT YEAR SINGLE CENTRE UK EXPERIENCE
A.Z. Khan1, K. Amer1, G. Casali1, R. Wheeler2, D.F. Weeden1
1Wessex Cardiothoracic Centre, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK; 2Wessex Regional Centre for Padiatric Surgery, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
Objectives: To compare pectus excavatum correction using VATS-guided Nuss bar placement vs. Ravitch repair.
Methods: Between 2001 and 2009, 83 patients underwent correction for pectus excavatum: group 1, 16/83, using the Ravitch procedure (vertical midline incision with cartilage cutting and sternal osteotomy); group 2, 67/83, VATS-guided Nuss (convex steel bar inserted under the sternum through 2" bilateral thoracic incisions). One VATS procedure was converted to open. The bar was removed after three years for Nuss and after one year for Ravitch. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS.
Results: There were significantly more males than females in both groups. Mean age: group 1, 29±11 years, group 2, 17±5.4 years (P<0.0005). Mean hospital stay: group 1, 10±8.5 days, group 2, 6.5±1.3 days (P=0.002). Previous pectus repair: group 1, 3/16, group 2, 1/83 (P=0.003). Wound infection: group 1, 8/16, group 2, 6/67 (P<0.0005). Pain: group 1, 1/16, group 2, 12/83 (P=0.069). Cosmetic approval: Nuss >Ravitch (P=0.005). Regression: group 1, 4/16, group 2, 0/83 (P<0.0005). There was no difference between the groups for other complications, i.e. pneumothorax, chest infection, effusions, and readmissions.
Conclusions: VATS-guided insertion of the Nuss bar for correction of pectus excavatum is safe and has good cosmetic results compared to Ravitch repair. It is our procedure of choice for primary pectus excavatum up to 25 years of age. Beyond that age, pain is a major issue. VATS facilitates the safe creation of the retrosternal tunnel.